Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The linear no threshold model is not supported by actual evidence. More accurate models include

Linear-Quadratic (LQ) Model

Threshold Model

Hormesis model

The linear no-threshold model is less realistic than threshold or hormesis-based models: An evolutionary perspective

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000927971...

"They removed the "as low as reasonably possible" design goal which means it's now allowed to dump radioactive waste into a river to save money"

This is just an incredibly stupid lie that completely destroys your credibility.

The ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle paired with hyper-sensitive detection technology requires nuclear operators to spend billions on redundant safety features and extensive permitting for infinitesimal health benefits. This regulatory burden prices nuclear energy out of the market.



Sounds like it wasn't reasonably possible?


It wasn't reasonably affordable!


Why would things that are not reasonably achievable have any relevance to "as low as reasonably achievable"?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: