Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think you’re going to need about 10,000,000 qbits to divert a transaction, but that’s still within foreseeable scale. I think it’s extreme likely that the foundation will have finished their quantum resistance planning before we get to 10MM coherent qbits, but still, it’s a potential scenario.

More likely that other critical infrastructure failures will happen within trad-finance, much larger vulnerability footprint, and being able to trivially reverse engineer every logged SSL session is likely to be a much more impactful turn of events. I’d venture that there are significant ear-on-the-wire efforts going on right now in anticipation of a reasonable bulk SSL de cloaking solution. Right now we think it doesn’t matter who can see our “secure” traffic. I think that is going to change, retroactively, in a big way.



I agree that the scary scenario is stored SSL frames from 20 years of banking. That's nuclear meltdown scenarios.


To do what? Replay? Just curious on an attack vector.


Hopefully replay attacks will not be useful, but confidential information will be abundant. There will be actionable information mixed in there , and it will be a lot of data. Just imagine if everything whispered suddenly became shouted.


It could be true. But pearls are rare and storage is expensive.


It is.. and I don’t see a way to avoid it.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: