Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It is simply saying the assumption of a normal distribution is incorrect for the population, which without context of what particular data they were observing would be impossible to know if it is in fact nonsense.


So, quite sesnsical indeed but possibly, circumstantially incorrect? It seems like a non-controversial stance to take.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: