Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I am not your lawyer, this is not legal advice.

I've quoted the one bit of your statement I agree with. You suggest an entirely artificial relationship to completely bypass the clear intention of the licence. To be blunt, that's a terrible suggestion.



I encourage you to reconcile your disagreement with my first paragraph, and GPL 3.0 section 2 paragraph 2. (I certainly respect your disagreement with my second paragraph, though!)


Okay to be fair, your first paragraph was spot on! It's an interesting but not widely discussed exception.

(I think the word "purpose" in said paragraph encapsulates why I strongly disagree with your conclusion on your second paragraph.)





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: