Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Cloud backup is a stupid idea. At any moment it could go dark, for any reason, and you have no recourse. Might as well bare your throat and hand some random stranger a razor.

It's not stupid but redundancy is important, don't rely on cloud only.

My own anecdata: I lost a couple TBs with Streamload[0] ~2007 when they switched over to MediaMax. They wouldn't admit it was their fault and I never got any kind of compensation - even though I had just renewed my yearly subscription a couple months prior. Thankfully I had offline backups on CD/DVD but that was definitely no fun. More recently CrashPlan decided to no longer offer unlimited backup for non-enterprise users i.e. I would have to pay a LOT more money to back up multiple TBs. At least they offered me a partial refund for the remaining months in my yearly subscription. I really really hope Backblaze keeps their unlimited plan.

As for physical backups, my 8-drive RAID-5 GPT partition got somehow nuked when I was trying out a new Windows 8 installation (one of the first official builds). I never found out what actually caused it, but I immediately went back to Windows 7 and waited for 10 to be out for a couple years before finally switching over. I'm still paranoid and keep my backup server separate and off the network except to make diff backups.

Bit-rot is also becoming a serious issue. I hope to finally build a home ZFS server (with ECC RAM of course) to deal with this, as I've noticed non-streaming encoded videos sometimes just stop working after 15+ years. I'm not sure if it's actually bit-rot but I can't think of anything else that would cause this to happen.

In any case, keep multiple backups: offline and online!

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvanix



> bit rot

Hard disk drives go on sale regularly. I replace mine usually once a year or so. They're not expensive relative to the loss of the data. I just bought a 500G SSD drive on sale for $60.


Do people buy SSDs for backup purposes? Sure it's fast, but isn't it better to get 6x the storage for the same price?


I've read that SSDs are also generally more susceptible to data degradation earlier than spinning rust, although I'm not sure how true that is. Wikipedia[0] says:

- Solid-state media...store data using electrical charges, which can slowly leak away due to imperfect insulation.

- Magnetic media...may experience data decay as bits lose their magnetic orientation. Periodic refreshing by rewriting the data can alleviate this problem. In warm/humid conditions these media, especially those poorly protected against ambient air, are prone to the physical decomposition of the storage medium.

In either case, only ZFS/Btrfs/ReFS seem to implement strategies to deal with data corruption. Kinda sad that Apple recently released a new FS and didn't bother to address this.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_degradation


These are small and very convenient, and don't need a power supply. Great for trip use. I wouldn't use them for long term storage.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: