- What are the potential benefits of spintronics to technology? Would it make electronics cheaper, smaller, more efficient, ...? Would it allow something that we currently couldn't do?
- "For example, whether placing a semiconductor in contact with another material would impede spin transport across the interface is far from well-understood." ...This seems like an eminently testable thing- just take a semiconductor, put it in contact with something else, put a, uh, spin current (layman!) through them and check for impedance. What hilariously ignorant mistake am I making? : )
One application that he discusses is IBM's use of spintronics in the read heads of hard drives (i.e., spinning rust), which allowed them to increase sensitivity and to increase the storage density of the disks.
> Would it make electronics cheaper, smaller, more efficient
As the name implies, it uses transport of spin rather than electrons themselves. The electrons may not move at all (you can have a spin current with no electric current at all). So it'd no longer be electronics.
The current premise is more dense memory devices with lower power consumption.
> This seems like an eminently testable thing- just take a semiconductor, put it in contact with something else, put a, uh, spin current (layman!) through them and check for impedance. What hilariously ignorant mistake am I making?
Well, where do I start?
Think about these: how do you generate a spin current? How much is it? How do you measure it? (hint: no, there is no such thing as spinmeter) How do you store/switch/manipulate bits? How does it effect magnetization, temperature, electric current, chemical potential? (these are all intricately coupled things) What kind of spin waves is it going to generate? Can you treat them as quasi particles? (magnons) Will there be a flow of magnons? What are the transport properties and how does an interface affect it (it's not easy to isolate and measure only a single transport coefficient in practice)? What is your order parameter? Are we talking about a ferromagnet, antiferromagnet or ferrimagnet? Are they interfaced? What are the transport properties of your interface? What is your Landau free energy (from which you can calculate effective field or ground state)? Which phase of matter are you in? Helical phase? Skyrmion crystal phase? Canted/polarized phase? What is your geometry? What kind of stray field does it generate? What are your anisotropies? Does your system have a strong spin-orbit copuling? What is your overall spin transfer torque? How do all these depend of temperature / thermal fluctuations? etc etc etc.
And keep in mind that almost all the physical observables we're talking about are really really really tiny. We're talking about quantum mechanical effects.
I hope by now it is clear that you have to come up with an "impedance" on your own tailored to your system, taking all the relevant physical aspects of your system into account (which requires a good background in condensed matter physics). There is no generic "impedance" of "spinmeter" that will work in any situation.
And generally, the issue is not measuring spin current or transport properties in an existing system. And you certain don't want to make devices randomly and measure its properties until something nice comes out miraculously: you have to "engineer" the desired properties (which typically requires very specific conditions), from ground up.
So it's a little different from connecting a lamp and a resistor to a battery and see whether it lights up or not. Suffice it to say that it's more complicated than your average high school science experiments.
Your paragraph after "where do I start" is so incomprehensible that I'm not entirely sure you're not simply spouting random technobabble at me. But I get the idea. :D
> "Spin" in quantum physics is more of an artistic interpretation of the term. It's similar to how Autism and other disorders have a "spectrum", but aren't divided into colors.
> With wave-particle duality, spin signifies how in-phase one particle's wave part is with the wave part of other particles.
What? Is this a joke? (I'm serious, because it's not even wrong)
Edit: Since I wrote my reply, the parent was fist deleted, and then edited into a quote from a blog post which tries to explain spin to layman. Well, whatever.
Arrived too late to see the post you're replying to, but isn't it fair to say that an electron's spin, though it corresponds to a notion of angular momentum mathematically, is a little different to everyday ideas of spin? Not least in that spin-half particles like the electron must "rotate" 720 rather than 360 degrees before they get back where they started.
There's an accidental similarity between the groups SO(3) and SU(2), which works for spin. There are other quantum numbers such as flavor SU(3) for there is no mathematical coincidence and such analogies won't work.
The differences between SU(2) and SO(3) go beyond just "rotate 720 rather than 360 and you're back where you started".
While I understand the urge of expressing new things in terms of what you know, sometimes, analogies aren't helpful and distort reality, and you just need to accept that there can be things in the nature that doesn't correspond to anything in your daily life in the real sense of the word.
That being said, the original parent post (which I quoted, so it's actually there) is total nonsense.
Could you recommend a good entry point for understanding group theory? It's always been particularly impenetrable, and the wiki page doubly so. Book or video or blog post or even private college course - anything would be appreciated.
Is spin the exact same physical phenomena as 'macroscopic' spin, but on a quantum scale? If not, just curious, why use the same word?
I can recommend Howards Georgi's Lie Algebras in Particle Physics which is a good introduction in the context of particle physics (yes, it covers both Lie algebras and groups).
No, it is nothing like the angular momentum of a spinning object. The name is rooted in a historical misconception. It is a form on angular momentum, which caused the misunderstanding. As of today, we still do not have a deeper understanding of spin in quantum mechanics: it's just some intrinsic angular momentum with SU(2) symmetry, and the value of angular momentum is in general different between particles (corresponding to the irreducible representations of SU(2), and the angular momentum is mostly 1/2 or 1 in units of reduced Planck constant except for some exotic/composite particles).
- What are the potential benefits of spintronics to technology? Would it make electronics cheaper, smaller, more efficient, ...? Would it allow something that we currently couldn't do?
- "For example, whether placing a semiconductor in contact with another material would impede spin transport across the interface is far from well-understood." ...This seems like an eminently testable thing- just take a semiconductor, put it in contact with something else, put a, uh, spin current (layman!) through them and check for impedance. What hilariously ignorant mistake am I making? : )